Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2010, 56(9):409-420 | DOI: 10.17221/93/2009-AGRICECON

Empirical research on farm households' attitude and behaviour for cultivated land transferring and it's influencing factors in China

Mei-qiu CHEN1, Tai-yang ZHONG2, Bing-juan ZHOU1, Hong-sheng HUANG1, Wei-jia HE1
1 Department of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
2 Department of Territorial Resources and Tourism, Nanjing University, Nanjing,

Cultivated land transfer is an important way to deal with the conflict between the cultivated land fragmentation of landholders and the large-scale agricultural modernization in China. The farm households, as the direct user of cultivated land, play a key role in the cultivated land transfer. For this paper, a survey of 1 396 farm households in 74 villages, 64 townships, 42 counties in Jiangxi, the traditional agricultural province, was conducted. Using this information, a logistic regression model was employed and the attitudes of those farm households were analyzed using the family characteristics, the household economic factors and the resource endowments. The results showed that there is a little incentive for the cultivated land transfer and no macro-environment exists for the cultivated land transfer market because of the low economic benefits. Farm households which moved out to urban areas for employment play the most important role in the cultivated land transfer and become the largest force to drive the cultivated land transfer out. Family income also affects the cultivated land transfer; the income of farm households transferring cultivated land in is much lower than those of the cultivated land transferring out. In addition, the topographic characteristic of cultivated land is also an important factor influencing the cultivated land transfer; it is easier to transfer land out if the terrain is flat, but it is more difficult if the land is fragmented.

Keywords: farm households, cultivated land transfer, attitude; behaviour, empirical study

Published: September 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
CHEN M, ZHONG T, ZHOU B, HUANG H, Wei-jia H. Empirical research on farm households' attitude and behaviour for cultivated land transferring and it's influencing factors in China. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2010;56(9):409-420. doi: 10.17221/93/2009-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Awasthi M.K. (2009): Dynamics and resource use efficiency of agricultural land sales and rental market in India. Land Use Policy, 26: 736-743. Go to original source...
  2. Chen M.-q., Liu Z.-t., Zhou B.-j. (2006): Empirical analysis of the survival and development of the rural environment and the farm households' use of cultivated land. Chinese Rural Economy, 2: 49-54.
  3. Chen M.-q., Deng A.-z., Zhou B.-j. et al. (2005): An empirical study on farm households' feelings among different groups on cultivated land protection. China Soft Science, 9: 50-56
  4. Deininger K., Zegarra E., Lavadenz I. (2003): Determinants and impacts of rural land market activity: Evidence from Nicaragua. World Development, 31: 1385-1404. Go to original source...
  5. Doucha T., Divila E. (2005): Possible impacts of the Czech agricultural policy after the EU accession on the land market and land usage. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 51: 185-193. Go to original source...
  6. Du W.-x., Huang X.-j. (2005): Regional difference and influencing factors of farm households' willingness of rural land transmission: A case study of Shanghai, Nanjing, Taizhou and Yangzhou cities in Yangtze-Delta Region. Resource Science, 27: 90-94.
  7. Huang Y., Huang X.-j. (2005): Study on factors influencing women's decision-making in farmland transfer - a case study of sample villages in Taizhou of Jiangsu Province. China Land Science, 19: 12-15.
  8. Hudečková H., Loą»ák M. (2002): Czech farmers facing agricultural policy in the period of revitalization. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 48: 233-243. Go to original source...
  9. Kung J.K.-s. (2002): Off-farm labor markets and the emergence of land rental markets in rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30: 395-414. Go to original source...
  10. Latruffe L., Doucha T., Le Mouel C., Medonos T., Voltr V. (2008): Capitalisation of the government support in agricultural land prices in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 451-460. Go to original source...
  11. Lerman Z., Shagaida N. (2007): Land policies and agricultural land markets in Russia. Land Use Policy, 24: 14-23. Go to original source...
  12. Lin Y.-f. (1994): The major problem and prospect of Chinese rural innovation in 1990s. Management World, 3: 139-144.
  13. Loą»ák M., Hudečková H., Rikoon S. (1999): Land ownership and the challenge of late modernity (new institutional settings and behaviour of Czech landowners). Agricultural Economics - Czech, 45: 481-490.
  14. LU W.-d. (2006): SPSS for Windows Statistical Analysis. Electronics Industry press, Beijing.
  15. Ma X.-h., Cui H.-z. (2002): Establishing land transfer system, and promoting regional agriculture scale operation. Management World, 11: 63-77.
  16. Noev N. (2008): Contracts and rental behavior in the Bulgarian land market. Eastern European Economics, 46: 43-74. Go to original source...
  17. Qian W.-r. (2003): An analysis of the government function in the market-based circulation of agricultural land - a case study of farm households' conducts in Haining and Fenghua Zhejiang Province. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 33: 154-160.
  18. Qian Z.-h. (2002): Incomplete property right of rural land contractual management right and it's predicament in market circulation: theoretical and policy analysis. Management World, 6: 35-38.
  19. Ru W.-d. (2006): SPSS for Windows Statistical Analysis. Electronics Industry Press, Beijing.
  20. Tan S., Heerink N., Qu F. (2006): Land fragmentation and its driving forces in China. Land Use Policy, 23: 272-285. Go to original source...
  21. Tan S., Qu F., Huang X. (2001): Difference of farm households' land use decision making and land conservation policies under market economy. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 24: 104-110.
  22. Tan S., Qu F., Heerink N. (2003): Analysis of land fragmentation and it's contributing factors. China Rural Survey, 6: 24-30.
  23. Teklu T., Lemi A. (2004): Factors affecting entry and intensity in informal rental land markets in Southern Ethiopian highlands. Agricultural Economics, 30: 117-128. Go to original source...
  24. Vranken L., Swinnen J. (2006): Land rental markets in transition: Theory and evidence from Hungary. World Development, 34: 481-500. Go to original source...
  25. Wegren S.K. (2003): Why rural Russians participate in the land market: Socio-economic factors. Post-Communist Economies, 15: 483-501. Go to original source...
  26. Wu J.-q. (2002): Study on Farmer's behavior in Farmland Transfer. [MS Dissertation.] Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.
  27. Yao Y. (2000): The development of the land lease market in rural China. Land Economics, 76: 252-266. Go to original source...
  28. Zaibet L.T., Dunn E.G. (1998): Land tenure, farm size, and rural market participation in developing countries: The case of the Tunisian olive sector. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46: 831-848. Go to original source...
  29. Zhang W., Makeham J. (1992): Recent developments in the market for rural land use in China. Land Economics, 68: 139-162. Go to original source...
  30. Zhang Q.F., Ma Q.G., Xu X. (2004): Development of land rental markets in rural Zhejiang: Growth of off-farm jobs and institution building. China Quarterly, 180: 1050-1072. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.