Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2010, 56(4):183-191 | DOI: 10.17221/23/2010-AGRICECON

Estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to firm heterogeneity

Lukáš ČECHURA
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

This paper deals with the estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to significant firm heterogeneity. Two main questions are elaborated. The first concerns the choice of a proper model specification, distinguishing between technical inefficiency and firm heterogeneity. The second question is related to the level of technical efficiency. The results show that only those model specifications allowing for the capture of time-invariant firm heterogeneity may provide consistent estimates of technical efficiency. Specifically, the Random Parameters family of models is a superior specification for the estimation of technical efficiency in the analysis. Moreover, technical inefficiency is a significant phenomenon in Czech agriculture. The average level of technical efficiency is around 90% for agricultural companies.

Keywords: firm heterogeneity, technical efficiency, SFA (Stochastic Frontier Analysis), agricultural companies

Published: April 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ČECHURA L. Estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to firm heterogeneity. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2010;56(4):183-191. doi: 10.17221/23/2010-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Aigner D., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt P. (1997): Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, 6: 21-37. Go to original source...
  2. Álvarez A., Arias C., Greene W. (2004): Accounting for unobservables in production models: management and inefficiency. Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2004/72, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
  3. Álvarez A., Arias C., Greene W. (2003): Fixed Management and time invariant technical efficiency in a random coefficient model. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University.
  4. Battese G.E., Coelli T.J. (1995): A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20: 325-332. Go to original source...
  5. Curtiss J. (2002): Efficiency and Structural Changes in Transition: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Czech Crop Production. Institutional Change in Agriculture & Natural Resources, Dissertation, Shaker Verlag GmbH, Germany; ISBN 3832203656, p. 283.
  6. Čechura L. (2009): Sources and limits of growth of agrarian sector - Analysis of efficiency and productivity of Czech agricultural sector: Application of SFA (Stochastic Frontier Analysis) (in Czech). 1 st ed. Wolters Kluwer ČR, Praha.
  7. Froněk P., Jelínek L., Medonos T. (2007): The multicriterial evaluation of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53: 123-131. Go to original source...
  8. Green W. (2003): Distinguish Between Heterogeneity and Inefficiency: Stochastic Frontier Analysis of the World Health Organization's Panel Data on National Health Care Systems. Working Papers 03-10, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics. Go to original source...
  9. Green W. (2002): Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models. Working Paper 02-16, Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
  10. Green W. (2005): Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 126: 269-303. Go to original source...
  11. Hockmann H., Pieniadz A. (2008): Farm Heterogeneity and Efficiency in Polish Agriculture: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. In: 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists - EAAE, Ghent, Belgium.
  12. Jelínek L. (2006): Relation between technical efficiency and technological change in milk production (in Czech). (Disertační práce), PEF ČZU, Praha.
  13. Kumbhakar S.C., Lovell C.A.K. (2000): Stochastic Frontier Analysis. 1 st ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Go to original source...
  14. Mathijs E., Blaas G., Doucha T. (1999a): Organisational Form and Technical Efficiency of Czech and Slovak Farms. MOCT-MOST, 9: 331-344. Go to original source...
  15. Mathijs E., Dries L, Doucha T., Swinnen J.F.M. (1999b): Production efficiency and organization of Czech agriculture. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 5: 312-324.
  16. Mathijs E., Tollens E., Vranken L. (2001): Contracting and Production Efficiency in Czech Agriculture. Working paper, Catholic University of Leuven.
  17. Medonos T. (2006): Investment activity and financial constraints of Czech agricultural companies (in Czech). (Disertační práce), PEF ČZU, Praha.
  18. Meeusen W., van den Broeck J. (1977): Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18: 435-444. Go to original source...
  19. Němec J., Štolbová M., Vrbová E. (2006):Land price in the Czech Republic in years 1993-2004 (in Czech). VÚZE, Praha.
  20. Orea L., Kumbhakar S.C. (2004): Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model. Empirical Economics, 29: 169-183. Go to original source...
  21. Pitt M., Lee L. (1981): The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of Development Economics, 9: 43-64. Go to original source...
  22. Střeleček F., Lossová J., Zdeněk R. (2007): Economic results of Agricultural Enterprises in 2005. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53: 201-216. Go to original source...
  23. Střeleček F., Lossová J., Zdeněk R. (2008): Economic results of agricultural holdings in less favoured areas. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 510-520. Go to original source...
  24. Tsionas E.G. (2002): Stochastic frontier models with random coefficients. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17: 127-147. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.