Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2009, 55(12):571-582 | DOI: 10.17221/115/2009-AGRICECON

Historical, environmental and socio-economic driving forces on land ownership fragmentation, the land consolidation effect and project costs

P. Sklenicka1, J. Hladík2, F. Střeleček3, B. Kottová1, J. Lososová3, L. Číhal4, M. ©álek5
1 Department of Land Use and Improvement, Faculty of Environment Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Department of Accounting and Finances, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
4 Central Land Office, Ministry of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic
5 Department of Ecology and Environment, Faculty of Environment Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

Land consolidation (LC) is an effective program for land ownership defragmentation. The main objectives of this study are: (i) to analyse the characteristics of 487 study areas before and after implementation of the LC; (ii) to evaluate these study areas according to the influence of historical, environmental and socio-economic driving forces on the pre-LC ownership pattern, on the consolidation effect and on the financial costs of the LC projects. In average, the plot size has been increased twofold and the plot shape has also achieved an evidently positive change, but the average owner still has a holding of 2.72 ha divided into more than three plots after the LC. Historical factors were found to be the key driving forces for the pre-LC fragmentation, while socio-economic drivers play the major role for the LC effect and in the formation of the LC project costs. In contrast, the effect of natural factors is considered to be the least significant of all.

Keywords: land consolidation, rural development, fragmentation, land reform, land use planning, land market

Published: December 31, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sklenicka P, Hladík J, Střeleček F, Kottová B, Lososová J, Číhal L, ©álek M. Historical, environmental and socio-economic driving forces on land ownership fragmentation, the land consolidation effect and project costs. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2009;55(12):571-582. doi: 10.17221/115/2009-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aligica P.D., Dabu A. (2003): Land reform and agricultural reform policies in Romania's transition to the market economy - Overview and assessment. Eastern European Economics, 41: 49-69. Go to original source...
    2. Binswanger H., Deininger K., Feder G. (1995): Agricultural land relations in the developing world. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75: 1242-1248. Go to original source...
    3. Blaas G. (1995): Agriculture in Slovakia - A forced re-structuring? Sociologia, 27: 134-141.
    4. Borec A. (2000): The significance of land consolidation for the development of farmland in Slovenia then and now. Berichte über Landwirtschaft, 78: 320-334.
    5. Cavailhès J., Wavresky P. (2003): Urban influences on periurban farmland prices. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30: 333-357. Go to original source...
    6. Christopher A.J. (1995): Land restitution in South-Africa, 1991-1994. Land Use Policy, 12: 267-279. Go to original source...
    7. Coelho J.C., Portela J., Pinto P.A. (1996): A social approach to land consolidation schemes - A Portuguese case study: The Valenca project. Land Use Policy, 13: 129-147. Go to original source...
    8. Coelho J.C., Pinto P.A., da Silva L.M. (2001): A system approach for the estimation of the effect of land consolidation projects (LCPs): a model and its application. Agricultural Systems, 68: 179-195. Go to original source...
    9. Crawley M.J. (2002): Statistical Computing. An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK.
    10. Crecente R., Alvarez C., Frau U. (2002): Economic, social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia. Land Use Policy, 19: 135-147. Go to original source...
    11. Csaki C., Lerman Z. (1997): Land reform and farm restructuring in East Central Europe and CIS in the 1990s: Expectations and achievements after the first five years. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 24: 428-452. Go to original source...
    12. Cudlinova E., Lapka M., Bartos M. (1999): Problems of agriculture and landscape management as perceived by farmers of the Sumava Mountains (Czech Republic). Landscape and Urban Planning, 46: 71-82. Go to original source...
    13. Czech Ministry of Agriculture (1996): Situační a výhledová zpráva - půda (Situation and perspective report - land). Ministerstvo zemědělství ČR, Praha.
    14. Dadak C. (2004): The case for foreign ownership of farmland in Poland. Cato Journal, 24: 277-294.
    15. Gonzales X.P., Alvarez C.J., Crecente R. (2004): Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape. Agricultural Systems, 82: 31-43. Go to original source...
    16. Gorton M., White J. (2003): The politics of agrarian collapse: Decollectivisation in Moldova. East European Politics and Societies, 17: 305-331. Go to original source...
    17. Hann C.M. (1993): From production to property - decollectivization and the family-land relationship in contemporary Hungary. Man, 28: 299-320. Go to original source...
    18. Janecek M. (1995): The potential risk of water and wind erosion on the soils of the Czech Republic. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 26: 105-118.
    19. Kopeva D. (2003): Land markets in Bulgaria. In: Groppo P. (ed): Land Reform 2003/3. FAO, Rome, pp. 41-58.
    20. Lapka M., Cudlinova E. (1999): Private farmer's attitudes to land, work and landscape: Interpretation of a case study in landscape ecological framework. Ekologia-Bratislava, 18: 401-412.
    21. Lazur R. (2005): Land consolidation in Slovakia. Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Land Consolidation and Territorial Organization. FAO, Prague, pp. 34-37.
    22. Lerman Z. (2001): Agriculture in transition economies: from common heritage to divergence. Agricultural Economics, 26: 95-114. Go to original source...
    23. Mather A. (1999): The Moral Economy and Political Ecology of Land Ownership. Unpublished contribution for the conference on Land Reform in Scotland Conference, Edinburgh College of Art/ Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.
    24. Miranda D., Crecente R., Alvarez M.F. (2006): Land consolidation in inland rural Galicia, N.W. Spain, since 1950: An example of the formulation and use of questions, criteria and indicators for evaluation of rural development policies. Land Use Policy, 23: 511-520. Go to original source...
    25. Nikodemus O., Bell S., Grine I., Liepins I. (2005): The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70: 57-67. Go to original source...
    26. Ravnikar L., Tanko D. (2005): Land consolidation in Slovenia. Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Land Consolidation and Territorial Organization. FAO, Prague, pp. 68-74.
    27. Reenberg A., Paarup-Laursen B. (1997): Determinants for land use strategies in a Sahelian agro-ecosystem - Anthropological and ecological geographical aspects of natural resource management. Agricultural Systems, 53: 209-229. Go to original source...
    28. Schwertmann U. (1982): Soil-erosion and land consolidation. Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Flurbereinigung, 23: 261-268.
    29. Sengupta N. (2006): Fragmented landholding, productivity, and resilience management. Environment and Development Economics, 11: 507-532. Go to original source...
    30. Sklenicka P. (2002): Temporal changes in pattern of one agricultural Bohemian landscape during the period 1938-1998. Ekologia-Bratislava, 21: 181-191.
    31. Sklenicka P. (2006): Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 23: 502-510. Go to original source...
    32. Sklenicka P., Salek M. (2008): Ownership and soil quality as sources of agricultural land fragmentation in highly fragmented ownership patterns. Landscape Ecology, 23: 299-311. Go to original source...
    33. S-Plus (2000): Professional Edition for Windows, Release 3 (August 2000), MathSoft, Inc., Seattle, Washington.
    34. Swinnen J.F.M. (1999): The political economy of land reform choices in Central and Eastern Europe. Economics of Transition, 7: 637-664. Go to original source...
    35. Swinnen J., Vranken L., Stanley V. (2 6): Emerging Challenges of Land Rental Markets - A Review of Available Evidence for the Europe and Central Asia Region. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
    36. Uhling J. (1989): Land consolidation - agriculture and environmental protection. Berichte über Landwirtschaft, 67: 426-456.
    37. van Dijk T. (2002): Central European land fragmentation in the years to come - a scenario study into the future need for land consolidation in Central Europe. In: Proceedings of FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, D.C., USA, 1-14.
    38. Vitikainen A. (2004): An overview of land consolidation in Europe. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1: 25-44.
    39. Viturka M. (1992): Atlas of the Environment and Health of the Population of the CSFR. Geografický ústav Akademie věd, Prague, Czech Republic.
    40. Vranken L., Noev N., Swinnen J.F.M. (2 4): Fragmentation, abandonment and co-ownership: Transition problems of the Bulgarian market. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 43: 391-408.
    41. Yaldir A.K., Rehman T. (2002): A methodology for constructing multi-criteria decision support systems for agricultural land consolidation using GIS and Electronics in Agriculture, 36: 55-78. Go to original source...
    42. Zadura A. (2005): Agricultural land management in the process of accession to the European Union. Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Land Consolidation and Territorial Organization. FAO, Prague, pp. 89-92.
    43. Zietara W. (1995): Aims and state of ownership transformation in Polish agriculture. Berichte über Landwirtschaft, 73: 157-174.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content