Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2009, 55(6):271-283 | DOI: 10.17221/48/2009-AGRICECON

The analysis of the current forms of organic chicken husbandry in the Czech Republic and their social consequences

L. Zagata
Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper deals with the development of the organic sector in the Czech Republic and by this it joins the current debate on the conventionalisation of organic agriculture. Using the case study method, it explores the situation of organically reared chicken. The main goal of the study is to find out to what extent the methods of organic farmers comply with the model of sustainable food production. The empirical analysis is based on the quantitative and qualitative approach. The results point out three different groups of producers, which are then described in detail with regard to their practices. The study suggests that the organic sector in the Czech Republic is becoming more differentiated and some of its current forms may violate the principles of sustainability. At the same time, it argues that this situation results from a more general framework of the modern society, which entails structures that are contradicting per se the sustainable model of food production.

Keywords: conventionalisation, sustainable development, alternative food networks, hygienic mode of control, organic eggs, organic chicken meat

Published: June 30, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zagata L. The analysis of the current forms of organic chicken husbandry in the Czech Republic and their social consequences. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2009;55(6):271-283. doi: 10.17221/48/2009-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Banks J., Marsden T.K. (2001): The nature of rural development: the organic potential. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3: 85-103. Go to original source...
  2. Beck U. (2004): Riziková společnost: Na cestě k jiné modernitě (Risk society: Towards a new modernity). Slon, Prague.
  3. Best H. (2007): Organic agriculture and the conventionalization hypothesis: A case study from West Germany. Agriculture and Human Values 24 (published online 19 June 2007).
  4. Buck D., Getz C., Guthman J. (1997): From farm to table: the organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis, 37: 3-21. Go to original source...
  5. Campbell H., Liepins R. (2001) Naming organics: understanding organic standards in New Zealand as a discursive field. Sociologia Ruralis, 41: 21-39. Go to original source...
  6. Conford P. (2001). The Origins of the Organic Movement. Floris Books, Edinburgh, UK.
  7. Coombes B., Campbell H. (1998): Dependent reproduction of alternative modes of agriculture: Organic farming in New Zealand. Sociologia Ruralis, 38: 3-20. Go to original source...
  8. ČSÚ (2008): Statistical Yearbook of the Czech Republic 2008. Available at http://www.czso.cz/csu/2008edicniplan.nsf/engt/6E00499142/$File/0001080910.xls [Quoted April 24 th 2009].
  9. Dabbert S., Häring A.M., Zanoli R. (2004): Organic Farming: Policies and Prospects. Zed Books Ltd., London, UK. Go to original source...
  10. Dixon J. (2002): The Changing Chicken: Chooks, Cooks and Culinary Culture. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, Australia.
  11. Guthman J. (2004): Agrarian Dreams. The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.
  12. Hall A., Mogyorody V. (2001): Organic farmers in Ontario: An examination of the conventionalization argument. Sociologia Ruralis, 41: 399-422. Go to original source...
  13. Heffernan W.D., Constance D.H. (1994): Transnational corporations and the globalization of the food systems. In: Bonanno A., Busch L., Friedland W., Gouveia L., Mingione E. (eds.): From Columbus to Conagra. The globalization of agriculture and food (pp. 29-51). University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
  14. IFOAM (2007): Principles of organic agriculture. Available at http://www.ifoam.org/organic_facts/principles/pdfs/IFOAM_FS_Principles_forWebsite.pdf [Quoted April 24th 2009].
  15. Jánský J., Živělová I. (2007): Subsidies for the organic agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (9): 392-402. Go to original source...
  16. Lockie S., Galpin D. (2 5): The 'conventionalisation' thesis reconsidered: structural and ideological transformation of Australian organic agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 45: 284-307.
  17. Lustigová L., Kušková P. (2006): Ecological footprint in the organic farming system. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 52: 503-509. Go to original source...
  18. Magdelaine P., Spiess M.P., Valceschini E. (2008): Poultry meat consumption trends in Europe. World's Poultry Science Journal, 64: 53-64. Go to original source...
  19. Marsden T.K. (2006): The road towards sustainable rural development: issues of theory, policy and practice in a European context. In: Cloke P.J., Marsden T., Mooney P.H. (eds.): Hanbook of rural studies (pp. 201-213). Sage, UK. Go to original source...
  20. Michelsen J. (2001): Recent development and political acceptance of organic farming in Europe. Sociologia Ruralis, 41: 3-20. Go to original source...
  21. MZe (2009): The list of organic farmers 31.12.2008. Available at http://www.mze.cz/UserFiles/File/Ekologicke_zemedelstvi/seznamy%2008%20na%20web.xls
  22. Ochránci hospodářských zvířat (2009): Velikonoce bez průmyslově produkovaných vajec! (Eastern without the industry-produced eggs). Available at http://www.ohz.cz
  23. Ogilv y (2008): Bio - v ý zkumná zpráva (Bio - research report). Available at http://www.mze.cz/attachments/BIO-_zprava_z_vyzkumu-_rozdelene_zavery.ppt
  24. Ploeg van der J.D., Renting H., Brunori G., Knickel K., Mannion J., Marsden T., de Roest K., SevillaGuzmán E., Ventura F. (2000): Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40: 391-408. Go to original source...
  25. Pollan M. (2 7): Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. Penguin Group (USA).
  26. Renting H., Marsden T., Banks J. (2003): Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A, 35: 393-411. Go to original source...
  27. Richter T., Padel S. (2007): The European Market for Organic Food. Available at http://orgprints org/1317 / [Quoted April 24 th 2009].
  28. Rosin, C., Campbell, H. (2 9): Beyond bifurcatio Examining the conventions of organic agriculture in New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies, Šaraptka B., Urban J. (2005): Ekologické zemědělství II (Organic agriculture II). Učebnice pro školy a praxi. Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, Prague.
  29. Singer P., Mason J. (2007): The Way We Eat: Why our Food Choices Matter. New York, Rodale, USA.
  30. Společnost pro zvířata (2009): Drůbež (Poultry). Available at http://www.spolecnostprozvirata.cz
  31. Striffler S. (2 7): Chicken: Dangerous Transform tion of America 's Favourite Food. Yale Universi Press.
  32. SZIF (2008): Co je bio (What is bio). Available at http://www.jimebio.cz
  33. Tabachnik B.G., Fidell L.S. (1996): Using Multivariate Statistics. 3rd ed., HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., Northridge, CA.
  34. Tomlinson I. (2008): Re-thinking the transformation of organics: the role of the UK government in shaping British organic food and farming. Sociologia Ruralis, 48: 133-151. Go to original source...
  35. Tovey H. (1997): Food, environmentalism and rural sociology: On the organic farming movement in
  36. Václavík T. (2007): Český trh s biopotravinami (Czech Knínice.
  37. Webster J. (1994): Animal Welfare: a Cool Eye Towards Eden. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
  38. Zagata L. (2 7): Bio cash-cow? Context and content of Czech organic farming. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (1): 45-53.
  39. Živělová I., Jánský J. (2007): The conditions of organic market development. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (9): 403-410. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.