Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2008, 54(12):555-566 | DOI: 10.17221/289-AGRICECON

LEADER in the Czech Republic and farming sector

H. Hudečková, M. Loą»ák
Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper addresses the LEADER approach in the Czech Republic. Using documentary research and content analysis of the appropriate documents and the Local Action Groups information sheets, the paper firstly outlines the evolution of the LEADER approach in the Czech Republic (the paper points out the difference in understanding LEADER in the EU /focusing on capacity building and the use of intangible forms of capital/ and in the Czech Republic EU /focusing on investments/). The paper also analyses the participation of farmers and the farming related actors in the LEADER approach (approx. 30% of local action groups are composed by those actors, however, they mostly do not aim /similarly like non-farming actors/ at developing partnership but want to achieve the investments into production; that is why the Czech local action groups are rather quasi-partnerships; it is also reflected in a very low number of strategies aiming at the "adding value to local products" which is the closest to farmers /but it is the less opted theme: only 6% of projects/). The paper ends with the analysis of projects implemented under the LEADER scheme where the farmers participate. It shows that more than the integrated strategies, the Czech local action groups prefer the strategies of the multi-sector type. The paper also points out that the publicly available information about the activities of the local action groups is not sufficient, although the groups are funded from the public budgets. This fact makes the analysis more difficult as for the scientific merit but also contradicts the principles of democratic governance.

Keywords: LEADER approach in the EU and in the Czech Republic, farmers in the LEADER approach, local action groups, governance

Published: December 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hudečková H, Loą»ák M. LEADER in the Czech Republic and farming sector. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2008;54(12):555-566. doi: 10.17221/289-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Böcher M. (2008): Regional Governance and Rural Development in Germany: the Implementaiton of LEADER+. Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (4): 372-388. Go to original source...
  2. Brabenec V., Neąetřilová H. (2007): On applications of the factor analysis in the agricultural research. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (10): 441-447. Go to original source...
  3. Bryden J. (2006): From Leader I to Leader+ and beyond to the Leader axis. Leader+ Magazine, 6: 8-12. European Commission. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rur/leaderplus/pdf/magazine/mag6_en.pdf [Quoted October 20, 2007.]
  4. Dargan L., Shucksmith M. (2008): LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (3): 274-291. Go to original source...
  5. Doucha T., Foltýn I. (2008): Czech agriculture after the accession to the European Union - impacts on the development of its multifunctionality. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54 (4): 150-157. Go to original source...
  6. Hubík S. (2007): Operational zones, countryside, network society. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (11): 491-494. Go to original source...
  7. Koutsouris A. (2008): The Battelefield for (Sustainable) Rural Development: The Case of Lake Plastiras, Central Greece). Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (3): 204-253. Go to original source...
  8. Loą»ák M. (2006): The influence of intangible forms of capital on farms. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 52 (6): 251-262. tivita. Manuskript habilitační práce (Regional and rural development as the activity - manuscript of habilitation thesis). PEF ČZU, Praha. Go to original source...
  9. Loą»ák M., Hudečková H. (2008): Agriculture and farming related activities: their actors and position in the LEADER approach. Agricultural Economics -Czech, 54 (6): 245-262. Go to original source...
  10. Kroupová Z., Červená G. (2007): Vyuľití teritoriálního marketingu v podmínkách MAS (The use of territorial marketing in the case of LAGs). In: Sborník prací z mezinárodní vědecké konference Agrární perspektivy (Conference proceedings from the international conference Agrarian perspectives), XVI (II): 949-956. PEF ČZU, Praha.
  11. Previte J., Pini B., Haslam-McKenzie F. (2007): Q Methodology and Rural Research. Sociologia Ruralis, 47 (2): 135-147. Go to original source...
  12. Ray C. (2000): The EU LEADER Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2): 163-171. Go to original source...
  13. Sucksmith M. (2000): Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: perspectives from LEADER in UK. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2): 208-218. Go to original source...
  14. Soukup A. (2008): Human capital, screening theory and education in agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (10): 475-478. Go to original source...
  15. ©korecová E., Farkaąová M. (2007): Social information in managerial accounting and managerial information system. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (8): 379-384. Go to original source...
  16. ©ulák T. (2006): MAS(ky) v Česku berou Leader útokem (Run of the Czech LAGs on Leader). Venkovské noviny, červen 2006 (5): 1; 3. Available at ny2006_5.pdf [Quoted August 10, 2006.]
  17. The Council of the European Union (2005a). Council regulation (EC) 1698/2005 of September 20, 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. Official Journal of the European Union L 277, 21/10/2005, pp. 1-40. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:277:0001:0040:EN:PDF [Quoted 25 February 2008.]
  18. The Council of the European Union (2005b). Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy. Official Journal of the European Union L 209, 11/08/2005, pp. 1-25.
  19. The Council of the European Union (2006). Council Decision 2006/144 (EC) of 20 February 2006 on Community strategic guidelines for rural development (programming period 2007 to 2013). Official Journal of the European Union L 055, 25/02/2006, pp. 20-29. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:055:0020:0029:EN:PDF [Quoted September 29, 2008.]
  20. Tichá I. (2008): Intellectual capital reporting. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54 (2): 57-62. Go to original source...
  21. Velký sociologický slovník (Sociological dictionary) (1996). Karolinum, Praha.
  22. Zagata L. (2007): Bio cash-cow? The context and content of Czech organic farming. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (1): 45-53. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.