Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2008, 54(7):322-332 | DOI: 10.17221/2709-AGRICECON

Multifunctional agriculture: evaluation of non-production benefits using the Analytical Hierarchy Process

S. Miškolci
Department of Business Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

Sustainable land use in agriculture involves the management of economic, environmental, and social services. In order to make the widely accepted concept of sustainable multifunctional agriculture operative for the design of agricultural policies, it is necessary to estimate the social demand for non-production outputs. This paper addresses the issue of matching agricultural policy with public preferences and willingness to pay for the possible non-production benefits that agriculture may deliver. Given the diversity of economic, social and environmental services, and the diversity of public needs, the reported study attempts to simplify and evaluate a very complex set of multifunctionality issues and to investigate the policy relevant trade-offs using the combination of the Contingent Valuation (CV) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods. The results obtained demonstrate the existence of a significant public demand for the investigated non-production outputs included in the multifunctionality concept in the Czech Republic.

Keywords: multi-functionality of agriculture, non-commodity outputs, non-market evaluation, Contingent Valuation, Analytical Hierarchy Process

Published: July 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Miškolci S. Multifunctional agriculture: evaluation of non-production benefits using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2008;54(7):322-332. doi: 10.17221/2709-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aczél J., Saaty T.L. (1983): Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27 (1): 93-102. Go to original source...
    2. Brubaker E.R. (2004): Eliciting the Public's Preferences: Insights from Contingent Valuation. Public Budgeting and Finance, 24 (1): 72-95. Go to original source...
    3. Dunn M.C. (1974): Landscape Evaluation Techniques: An Appraisal and Review of the Literature. Working paper No 4. Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham, England.
    4. Easley R.F., Valacich J.S., Venkataramanan M.A. (2000): Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision. European Journal of Operational Research, 125: 73-83. Go to original source...
    5. EC (1999): Safeguarding the Multifunctional Role of Agriculture: Which Instruments? Brussels: European Commission - DG Agriculture, September 9.
    6. Forman E, Peniwati K. (1998): Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal for Operational Research, 108: 165-169. Go to original source...
    7. Gass S.I., Rapcsák T. (2004): Singular Value Decomposition in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 154: 573-584. Go to original source...
    8. Hall C., McVittie A., Moran D. (2004): What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 20 (2): 211-225. Go to original source...
    9. Hanley N., Shogren J.F., White B. (1997): Environmental Economics. Macmillan Press, London; ISBN 0 333 58236 5.
    10. Kallas Z., Gómez-Limón A., Hulé J.B. (2007): Decomposing the value of agricultural multifunctionality: combining contingent valuation and the analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58 (2): 218-241. Go to original source...
    11. Kriströmm B. (1995): A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete responses valuation studies. Land Economics, 66 (2): 135-139. Go to original source...
    12. Křůmalová V. (2002): Evaluation of chosen benefits on environment and landscape coming from Czech agriculture. Agricultural Economics -Czech, 48 (1): 13-17. Go to original source...
    13. Kubíčková S. (2004): Contingent Valuation of the Landscape Amenity Function of Agriculture in the White Carpathians Protected Landscape Area. Development of the Czech Society in the European Union: V. Lectures in Non-market Valuation Methods in the Environmental Area. Matfyzpress, Charles University, Prague, pp. 259-268.
    14. Latacz-Lohmenn U. (2001): A Policy Decision Making Framework for Devising Optimal Implementation Strategies for Good Agricultural and Environmental Policy Practices. OECD, Paris.
    15. OECD (2000): Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. OECD, Paris.
    16. Saaty T.L. (1980): The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content