Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2007, 53(7):325-332 | DOI: 10.17221/1156-AGRICECON

An impact of direct payments on production decisions in agriculture

V. Bečvářová
Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

The paper deals with the employment of decoupled direct payments as the model of targeted lump-sum financial transfers to the farmers. It considers whether decoupled payments may alter producers' resource allocation over time and lead to effects on production. Decisive topics of influence through which decoupled payments as an instrument of income redistribution could affect production through recipient' decisions in both short and long time horizons are bringing to the attention as follows: wealth and investment effects, sector consolidation and payment basis effects in the framework of agricultural policy.

Keywords: agricultural policy, competitiveness, economic costs, decoupled payments, income redistribution, investment, wealth

Published: July 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bečvářová V. An impact of direct payments on production decisions in agriculture. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2007;53(7):325-332. doi: 10.17221/1156-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Bečvářová V. (2002): The changes of the agribusiness impact on the competitive environment of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 48 (10): 449-455. Go to original source...
  2. Bečvářová V. (2005): Agribusiness - the scope as well as the opportunity for contemporary agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 51 (7): 285-292. Go to original source...
  3. Bečvářová V. (2006a): Impact of decoupled payments on competitiveness of agricultural enterprises. In: EAAE, Impact of Decoupling and Cross Compliance on Agriculture in the Enlarged EU. Prague, pp. 1-11; ISBN 80-213-1522-9.
  4. Bečvářová V. (2006b): Utilisation of subsidy in a program-directed support of agricultural loans. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 52 (7): 256-267. Go to original source...
  5. Boehlje M.D., Doering O. (2000): Farm policy in industrialized agriculture. Journal of Agribusiness, 18 (1): 53-60.
  6. Boehlje M.D., Akridge J.T., Kalaitzandonakes N.G. (2002): Preparing for success in the agribusiness market place. Journal of Agribusiness, 20 (1): 31-39.
  7. Harvey D.R. (1997): Extensions and Political analysis of the CAP. The Common Agricultural Policy, CAB International, New York.
  8. Harvey D.R. (2005): What do we need to know? Implications of the knowledge economy, the information society & ICT. In: Agrarian Perspectives XIV, part I, pp. 10-18, Prague; ISBN 80-213-1372-2.
  9. Chau N.H., De Gorter H. (2001): Disentangling the consequences of direct payment schemes in agriculture on fixed costs, exit decisions and output. Working Paper 2001-16. Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
  10. OECD (1994): Agricultural Policy Reform: New Approaches., The role of direct income payments. OECD Publications, Paris.
  11. OECD (1998): Decoupling: farm income support.
  12. OECD (2001): Decoupling: a conceptual overview.
  13. OECD (2005): Decoupling: Illustrating some open questions on the production impact of
  14. Saxovsky D.M., Duncan M.R. (1998): Understanding Agriculture's Transition into the 21 st Century. Agricultural Economic Report, No 181. North Dakota State University, USA.
  15. Westcott P.C., Young C.E. (2005): Influence of Decoupled Farm Programs on Agricultural Production. USDA ERS, Working paper. Washington.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.