Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2007, 53(1):30-35 | DOI: 10.17221/845-AGRICECON

Work motivation and the municipality size

L. Kolman, P. Michálek, H. Chamoutová, K. Chamoutová, L. Müllerová
Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

The article shows the results of the grant project of Czech Science Foundation 406/03/0896, which focused on the survey of work motivation and quality of working life issues in the Czech country. The results concern an analysis of variation and a range of coefficients and show statistically significant differences in motivational coefficients in sets that differ in the respondents size of residence. The main aim of the survey was to find out if it is possible to identify the differences in work motivation between people from large cities and people from small municipalities, namely between inhabitants of the Prague metropolitan area and smaller municipalities placed near to the national boundary. The survey was conducted by means of the EDMK questionnaire, which is described elsewhere (see references). Some specific questions were added by the present authors. Statistical analysis of the data obtained resulted in the findings, as follows: (1) questionnaire scales used are sufficiently reliable (as proved by the Cronbachs' alphas statistics); (2) statistically significant differences were identified in the motivational patterns of the Prague Metropolitan Area and small municipalities inhabitants; (3) the quality of working life in Czechia was found as a rather low; it results in lower perceived responsibility and job involvement found in the whole sample of Czech responses.

Keywords: motivation, working life quality, EDMK, Czech countryside

Published: January 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kolman L, Michálek P, Chamoutová H, Chamoutová K, Müllerová L. Work motivation and the municipality size. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2007;53(1):30-35. doi: 10.17221/845-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Arnold J., Silvester J., Patterson F., Robertson I., Cooper C., Burnes B. (2005): Work Psychology. Understanding Human Behaviour in the Workplace. Prentice Hall, London.
  2. Kolman L. (2001): Motivation and attributive processes. Agrární perspektivy X., ČZU Praha; ISBN 80-213-0848-6.
  3. Roe R.A., Zinovieva I.L., Dienes E., Ten Horn L.A. (2000): A comparison of work motivation in Bulgaria, Hungary and the Netherlands: Test of a model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (4): 658-687. Go to original source...
  4. Šařecová P., Hladíková M. (2005): Kvalita zkušebních testů. In: Proceedings of the Conference Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, ČZU, Kostelec nad Černými Lesy, 20-21 June, pp. 205-212.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.