Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2006, 52(8):347-352 | DOI: 10.17221/5033-AGRICECON

The spillover effect of foreign direct investment - the case of Slovak beer and malt production sector

P. Bielik, J. Pokrivčák, A. Qineti, N. Pokrivčáková
Slovak Agriculture University, Nitra, Slovak Republic

The paper deals with the FDI spillover effects in production of beer and malt in Slovakia. Malt producers have a dominant position in the market. The use of the almost monopsonistic power of malt producers is constrained the by low asset specificity of primary producers of barley, other outlets for the disposal of barley (export), and demand for high quality of malt from malt producers. Because of high dependence of malt producers for high quality and reliable deliveries of barley, malt producers provide a significant assistance of primary farmers.

Keywords: FDI, spillover effect, barley, malt, beer, Slovakia

Published: August 31, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bielik P, Pokrivčák J, Qineti A, Pokrivčáková N. The spillover effect of foreign direct investment - the case of Slovak beer and malt production sector. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2006;52(8):347-352. doi: 10.17221/5033-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Aitken B.J., Harrison A.E. (1999): Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? American Economic Review, 89 (3): 605-618. Go to original source...
  2. Bielik P., Rajčániová M. (2004): Competitiveness analysis of agricultural enterprises in Slovakia. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 50, (12): 556-560. Go to original source...
  3. Blanchard O. (1997): The Economics of Post-Communist Transition. Oxford, Clarendon Press. Go to original source...
  4. Ciaian P., Swinnen J.F.M. (2006): Land Market Imperfections and Agricultural Policy Impacts in the New EU Member States: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics (Forthcoming). Go to original source...
  5. Ciaian P., Pokrivčák J., Bartova L. (2005): Slovak Agriculture in the European Union. Journal of Economics (Ekonomický Časopis), 53 (7): 736-752; ISSN 0013-3035.
  6. Dolan C., Humphrey J. (2000): Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: the impact of UK supermarkets on the African horticulture industry. Journal of Development Studies, 37 (2): 147-176. Go to original source...
  7. Dries L., Swinnen J.F.M. (2002): The Impact of EU Accession and Foreign Investment on Product Quality and Enterprice Restructuring: Evidenec from the Polish Dairy Sector. Paper presented in the Working Group on "Rural and Agricultural Development" at the 10 th General Conference of the European Association of Development Institutions, Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 19-21.
  8. Gisser M. (1999): Dynamic gains and static losses in oligopoly: evidence from the beer industry, Economic Inquiry, 37 (3): 554-575. Go to original source...
  9. Gow H., Streeter D., Swinnen J. (2000): How private contract enforcement mechanisms can succeed where public institutions fail: the case of Juhosucor A.S. Agricultural Economics, 23 (3): 253-265. Go to original source...
  10. Gow H.R., Swinnen J.F.M. (1998a): The Impact of FDI on CEEC Agricultural Growth: Case Studies. Policy Research Group Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
  11. Gow R.H., Swinnen F.M.J. (1998b): How foreign direct investment has stimulated growth in the Central and Eastern European agri-food sectors: vertical contracting and the role of private enforcement capital. Policy Research Group, Working Paper, No. 18, Department of Agricultural Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, May.
  12. Gow H., Swinnen J. (2001): Foreign direct investment and vertical contracting in the agro-food sector of transition countries. In: Schmitz A., Rausser G., Zilberman D. (ed.): Agricultural Globalization, Trade and the Environment. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston. Go to original source...
  13. Hart O. (1995): Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Go to original source...
  14. Holloway G.J., Peyton L.J., Griffith G.R. (2000): Was the Australian meat and live-stock corporation's advertising efficient? Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 44 (1): 55-81. Go to original source...
  15. Hu A.G.Z., Jefferson G.H. (2000): FDI impact and spillover: Evidence from China's electronic and textile industries. World Economy, 25 (8): 1063-1076. Go to original source...
  16. Key N., Runsten D. (1999): Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Development, 27 (2): 381-420. Go to original source...
  17. Klein B., Crawford R.G., Alchian A.A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21 (2): 297-326. Go to original source...
  18. Kokko A. (1994): Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43 (2): 279-293. Go to original source...
  19. Kokko A., Tansini R., Zejan M.C. (1996): Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. Journal of Development Studies, 32 (4): 602-611. Go to original source...
  20. Konings J. (2000): The Effects of Direct Foreign Investment on Domestic Firms: Evidence from Firm Level Panel Data in Emerging Economies. William Davidson Institute, Working Papers series 334, University of Michigan Business School.
  21. Konings J., Walsh P.P. (1999): Disorganization in the process of transition Firm level evidence from Ukraine. Economics of Transition, 7 (1): 29-46. Go to original source...
  22. Kuzma F., Legesse D. (2001): Agricultural sector and government expenditures in Slovakia. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 47 (8): 353-355.
  23. Lall S. (1980). Vertical Interfirm linkages in LDCs: an empirical study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 42 (3): 203-226. Go to original source...
  24. Podolák A., Serenčéš R. (2003): Postavenie agrokomodít v medzinárodnom obchode. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 49 (8): 391-395. Go to original source...
  25. Stiglitz J. (1993): Incentives, Organizational Structures and Contractual Choice in the Reform of Socialist Agriculture. In: Braveman A., Brooks K., Csaki C.: The Agricultural Transition in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former USSR. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
  26. Swinnen J.F.M. (1998): Economic Transition and the Distribution of Policy Rents: The Case of the Wheat-Flour-Bread Chain in Bulgaria. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 25 (2): 243- 258 Go to original source...
  27. Swinnen J.F.M., Gow H.R. (1997): Agricultural Credit Problems and Polices During the Transition to a Market Economy in Central and Eastern Europe. Policy Research Group, Working Paper No. 6. Dept. of Agric. Econ., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.