Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2006, 52(7):311-320 | DOI: 10.17221/5028-AGRICECON

Utilisation of subsidy in a program-directed support of agricultural loans

V. Bečvářová
Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

The paper is focused on the performance measurement of the Support and Guarantee Fund for Farmers and Forestry (SGFFF) as the main instrument of capital reinforcement of Czech agricultural enterprise development. Its principles as well as the function from the point of view of agricultural enterprises, restructuring and allocation of resources and the reason why the subsidies of the supported loans' interest rates have been employed are cleared up there. The results are discussed upon an analysis of the Fund's activity. According to them, it can be claimed that the Fund has became an important part of supports for the agricultural sector development in the last ten years. From the point of view of the criteria of supported loans allocation, it was ascertained that the level of support has not been derived from the different natural and soil qualities primarily. The economic results and a high level of the prosperity have been evaluated as the main criteria for the decision-making system regarding an effective restructuring of agriculture and improving its competitiveness.

Keywords: agriculture, competitiveness, loan, interest rate, restructuring, subsidy of primary factors

Published: July 31, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bečvářová V. Utilisation of subsidy in a program-directed support of agricultural loans. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2006;52(7):311-320. doi: 10.17221/5028-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Ahn S. (2002): Competition, innovation and productivity growth: A Review of Theory and Evidence. OECD ED Working Papers No 317. Go to original source...
  2. Aghion P. et al. (2001): Empirical estimates of the relationship between product market competition and innovation. Mimeograph, University College London.
  3. Bečvářová V. (1992): K základním problémům dotační politiky v zemědělství. Zemědělská ekonomika, 38 (6): 453-466.
  4. Bečvářová V. (1994): Teoretické, metodologické a věcné problémy kapitálového trhu ve vztahu k nové podnikatelské struktuře APK. 1st edition. VÚZE, Prague.
  5. Bečvářová V. (2004): Shape of Financial Support for the Czech Agriculture Restructuring. Sborník z mezinárodní vědecké conference, Zagreb; ISBN 953- 6025-10-8.
  6. Bečvářová V. (2005): Podpůrný a garanční rolnický a lesnický fond jako nástroj zefektivnění dotací v zemědělství. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, LIII (6): 7-18; ISSN: 1211-8516.
  7. Grega L. a kol. (2004): Mimoprodukční přínos trvale udržitelného multifunkčního zemědělství v podmínkách ČR. Part I - Analýza finančně ekonomické situace zemědělských podniků a jejich důchodových zdrojů. Continuous annual report for the year 2003, MZLU Brno.
  8. Henrichsmeyer W., Witzke H. P. (1994): Agrarpolitik 2, Bewertung und Willemsbildung. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart; ISBN 3-8252-1718-3.
  9. Munk K.J. (1989): Price support to the EC agricultural sector: an optimal policy? Oxford Review of Agricultural Economics, 5 (2): 76-89; ISBN 92-826-8837-2. Go to original source...
  10. Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (2003). Situační a výhledová zpráva: Půda; ISBN 80-7084292-X.
  11. Ministry of Agriculture - URL: <www.mze.cz>
  12. PGRLF, a.s. The Support and Guarantee Fund for Farmers and Forestry, a. s. - URL: <www.pgrlf.cz>

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.