Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2005, 51(7):293-303 | DOI: 10.17221/5110-AGRICECON

Price transmission and estimations of price elasticity of secondary demand functions: application on commodity market for food grains

P. Syrovátka, I. Lechanová
Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

The paper is focused on the quantitative analysis of the price transmission and on its use for the estimations of the direct price elasticity of the vertical-derived demand functions. The price transmissions were examined between the commodity markets for the food grain and the consumer markets for the bakery products and flour. The data (1995-2002) were taken over from the Czech Statistical Office (CSO), the Price Statistics (PS) and the Statistics of Family Budgets (SFB). The intensity of the inter-market price transmission was assessed by means of the coefficients of the price transmission elasticity (EPT). For enumerating of EPT, the regression linear models were developed. The explicit as well as the implicit time-definition in the models was tested. The explicit dynamic construction was carried out on the basis of the stationary process with the parabolic trend. After the determination of trend functions, the seasonal component in used time-series was thoroughly investigated by means of the harmonic analysis (G-tests of the individual extremes of the developed periodograms). The implicit dynamization of the linear models was solved on the basis of the first differences of appropriate commodity prices, respectively price levels on the consumer market. For the quantification of the price transmission elasticities, directly dynamized models there were only used only because the model unambiguously achieved better values of characteristics of the statistic verification (correlation index, F-test, T-test). These models also satisfied the economic assumptions in the sense of the vertical price transmissions between the observed market levels and the preservation of the law of diminishing demand. Based on the linear models of the price transmission with parabolic-trend stationarization, it was found out that within the observed period (1995-2002) EPT between commodity market with the food wheat and consumer market with the bakery products and flour reached the average level of +0.1602%. Within the same period, the value of EPT between commodity market with the rye and consumer market with the bakery products and flour reached the average level of +0.1067%. These coefficients were subsequently used together with coefficients of the own price elasticity of consumer demand for the bakery products and flour (ε) to the estimations of the own price elasticity of the commodity demand for food wheat and rye (e). In accordance with the construction of these estimations: e = ε × EPT, it was found out that the average level of the own price elasticity of the demand for food wheat (respectively rye) is about -0.0659% (respectively -0.0441%). Both observed secondary demand functions are therefore strongly inelastic with respect to the reaction on the direct price changes. The commodity demand for the rye seems to be more inelastic.

Keywords: price transmission, elasticity of price transmission, consumer demand for bakery products and flour, direct price elasticity of consumer demand, direct price elasticity of secondary demand

Published: July 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Syrovátka P, Lechanová I. Price transmission and estimations of price elasticity of secondary demand functions: application on commodity market for food grains. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2005;51(7):293-303. doi: 10.17221/5110-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Dufek J. (1993): Ekonometrie. PEF, VŠZ Brno, 132 p.; ISBN 80-7157-080X.
  2. Gardner B.L. (1975): The farm-retail price spread in a competitive food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57: 399-409; ISSN 0021-857X. Go to original source...
  3. George P.S., King G.A. (1971): Consumer Demand for Food Commodities in the United States With Projections 1980. Giannini Foundation Monograph No. 26, University of California, Berkeley.
  4. Hušek R. (1999): Ekonometrická analýza. 1. vyd. Ekopress, Praha, 303 p.; ISBN 80-86119-19-X.
  5. Mc Corriston S., Morgan C.W., Rayner A.J. (2001): Price transmission: the interaction between market power and returns to scale. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28: 143-159; Print ISSN: 0165-1587, Online ISSN: 1464-3618. Go to original source...
  6. Mc Corriston S. (2002): Why should imperfect competition matter to agricultural economists. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29: 349-371; Print ISSN: 0165-1587, Online ISSN: 1464-3618. Go to original source...
  7. Syrovátka P. Blažková I. (2003): Analýza cenových a příjmových vztahů ve spotřebitelské poptávce po pekárenských výrobcích. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, LI: 71-82. MZLU, Brno; ISBN 1211-8516.
  8. Syrovátka P. (2004) Analýza na spotřebitelském trhu s pekárenskými a mlýnskými výrobky. Sborník z mezinárodní vědecké konference Mezinárodní vědecké dny: Európská integrácia - výzva pre Slovensko. FEM SPU, Nitra: 1016-1024; ISBN 808096-356-0.
  9. Revoredo C.L., Nadolnyak D.A., Fletcher S.A. (2004): Explaining Price Transmission Asymmetry in the US Peanut Marketing Chain. Selected Papers prepared at the Annual Meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association. Colorado, Denver: 17 p.
  10. Wohlgenant M.K. (1989): Demand for Farm Output in a Complete System of Demand Functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71: 241-252; ISSN 0002-9092. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.