Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2004, 50(10):445-449 | DOI: 10.17221/5231-AGRICECON

Social construction of local/regional capital - methodology

S. Hubík
Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry, Brno, Czech Republic

The starting point for identifying environmental, social and cultural capitals in rural areas is integrated research based on methodological interconnection between quantitative and qualitative investigation. The sorts of capital are constructed by means of an interactive investigation in cooperation with insiders. In this way, such approach belong to endogenous investigating of reality and to the theory of social constructivism.

Keywords: social construction, social capital, cultural capital, environmental capital

Published: October 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hubík S. Social construction of local/regional capital - methodology. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2004;50(10):445-449. doi: 10.17221/5231-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Berger P., Luckmann, T. (1991): The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin, London.
    2. Boháčková I., Hrabánková M. (2003): Rozvojový potenciál v regionech a jeho monitoring (Development Potential of Rural Regions and its Monitoring). In: Nová ekonomika a rozšíření EU. Sborník prací z mezinárodní konference Agrární perspektivy XII, Díl II, ČZU PEF: Praha: 767-772.
    3. Garfinkel H. (1967): Studies in Ethnomethodology. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs.
    4. Grega L. (2003) (et al.): Extraproductional Benefit of Sustainable Multifunctional Agriculture in the Czech Republic (Part Social Cartography of Environmental, Social, Cultural Capital). Mendel University, Brno.
    5. Hubík S. (2001): Globalization and Community Development. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 47 (5): 189-193.
    6. Hubík S. (2002): Social and Cultural Logic of Regionalism. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 48 (2): 93-96. Go to original source...
    7. Jensen K.B., Jankowski N.W. (1993): A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies. Routledge, London-New York.
    8. Loučková I. (2003): Regionílní kapitál. Zpráva (Regional Capital. A Report). Sociotrendy: Olomouc (in the Czech language).
    9. Schutz A. (1962): Collected Papers I. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
    10. Schutz A. (1964): Collected Papers, Vol. 2. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. Go to original source...
    11. Schutz A., Luckmann T. (1973): The Structures of the LifeWorld. Vol. 1, Nordwestern University Press, Evaston.
    12. Terluin I.J. (2001): Rural Regions in the EU. Exploring Differences in Economic Development. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Utrecht-Groningen.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content