Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2003, 49(12):579-582 | DOI: 10.17221/5451-AGRICECON

The use of social and cultural potentials in regional development

T. Marek, T. Martinec
Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper deals with problems of regional (rural) development, especially with social and cultural impact on rural development. In the introductory chapter, authors reviewed economical and sociological concepts related to the Integrated Endogenous Regional Development (IERD). In the main part of the paper, authors discuss the presumptions of successful implementing of the IERD concept in the Czech Republic: 1) How are the opinions of rural people (public opinion) respected in the designed projects; and 2) The responsibility of the project designers to the regionally perceived needs. These two factors should be in harmony.

Keywords: development projects, social and cultural potentials, neo-classical theory, theory of growth of poles, post-Keynesian theory, social and cultural capital, integrated endogenous regional development

Published: December 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Marek T, Martinec T. The use of social and cultural potentials in regional development. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2003;49(12):579-582. doi: 10.17221/5451-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Garfoli G. (1992): Endogenous development and Southern Europe. Avebury, Aldershot, 4.
    2. Giddens A. (1999): Sociologie. Argo, Praha.
    3. Hubík S. (2000): Globalizace a rekonstrukce komunit. In: Agrární perspektivy IX.– Globalizace a konkurenceschopnost. PEF ÈZU v Praze, CD-R.
    4. Hudeèková H., Jehle R. (1997): Rurální rozvoj: zahranièní zkušenosti. Sborník Jihoèeské univerzity, 22 (2): 75–81, Èeské Budìjovice.
    5. Jehle R. (1998): Pojetí endogenního rurálního rozvoje a jeho zavádìní do politiky v Èeské republice. Zemìdìlská ekonomika, 44 (1): 9–17.
    6. Kayser B. (1990): La renaissance rurale (sociologie des campagnes du monde occidental). Paris.
    7. Shucksmith M. (2000): Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: perspectives from Leader in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2): 208-218. Go to original source...
    8. Pícha K. (2000): Sociálnì kulturní potenciály rozvoje venkovských obcí. Diplomová práce, ÈZU, Praha.
    9. Velký sociologický slovník (1996). Praha. http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rur/cork_en.htm

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content