Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2003, 49(7):301-309 | DOI: 10.17221/5402-AGRICECON
Social capital in the change of the Czech agriculture
- Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic
The paper continues the debate over the nature and the role of social capital in the Czech agriculture. This issue is not marginal because social capital is also emphasized in the Czech SAPARD Plan. The paper develops the thoughts of J. Chloupková and C. Bjřrnskov published in this journal in their paper "Could social capital help Czech agriculture?" (No. 6 in 2002). Differing form mentioned authors, this paper coins dual nature of understanding social capital. This understanding forms the background of the concept of social capital in the works of French sociologist P. Bourdieu. Dual concept of social capital interconnects the most often use of understanding social capital as coined by such authors like R. Putnam or J. Coleman (social capital is understood as supra-personal collective element enabling the co-ordination of activities of free individuals with equal rights thus enabling the effective operation of certain system as a collective entity) with understanding of social capital related to social status of an individual which creates the hierarchies related to power thus enabling an individual to achieve his/her goals. Using empirical data and the case study, the paper outlines the application of dual understanding of social capital in the analysis of some processes in the Czech farming. Dual concept of social capital enables to explain some circumstances, which might be in the case of one-way orientation of understanding social capital presented in rather simplified way (e.g. if and what form of social capital was weak or destroyed in the Czech agriculture and which continues to exist). This fact is documented through the case study of the changes inside large-scale farms and outside these farms (in the field of their external relations). This study documents the presence of both forms (dual concept) of social capital. Similarly, the dual concept of social capital is used in the analysis of social structure of the Czech agriculture. It is done in the comparison with the model of agriculture in European Union and in the projections into the questions of the action of actors in agriculture.
Keywords: social capital, agriculture, social change, social structure, social action
Published: July 31, 2003 Show citation
References
- Becker G. (1994): Ekonomický zpùsob pohledu na ivot (Pøednáka pøi pøíleitosti udìlení Nobelovy ceny, 9. prosince 1992). In: Joná J. a kol.: Oslava ekonomie (pøednáky laureátù Nobelovy ceny za ekonomii). Praha, pp. 727746.
- Bìlohradský V. (2002): Malý pøíruèní slovník globalizace: deset hesel k porozumìní a obranì. Salon (literární pøíloha Práva), 14. záøí, Praha.
- Blanc M. (1987): Pour une socio-économie de l´emloi rurale. Economie rurale, (5): 178179.
Go to original source...
- Bourdieu P. (1979): La Distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris.
- Corcuff P. (2000): Regards critiques. Dossier, (105): 3033.
Go to original source...
- Coser L.A. (1977): Masters of Sociological Thought. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
- Giddens A. (1989): Sociology. Cambridge.
- Falk I., Kilpatrick S. (2000): What is Social Capital? A Study of Interaction in a Rural Community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (1): 87110.
Go to original source...
- Heffernan W., Rikoon S., Heffernan J. (1994): Trvale udritelný rozvoj, rodinné farmy a venkovská spoleèenství: Alternativní vize venkova. In: Agrární perspektivy III. Trvale udritelný rozvoj. PEF VZ v Praze, s. 435441.
- Hudeèková H., Loák M. (1997): Reactions to Globalization and Integration in the Czech Agro-Food Complex. Journal of Rural Cooperation, 25 (2): 8399.
- Hudeèková H., Loták M. (1997): Reakce na globalizaèní výzvu v èeském zemìdìlsko-potravináøském komplexu. Zemìdìlská ekonomika, 43 (1):1525.
- Chloupková J, Bjørnskov Ch. (2002): Could social capital help Czech agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 48 (6): 245 249; ISSN 0139-570X.
Go to original source...
- Kayser B. (1990): La renaissance rurale (Sociologie des campagnes du monde occidental). Paris.
- Loák M. (1998) Rùzná vnímání globalizace a èeské zemìdìlství. In: Filipov I (Informatoria katedry sociologie Fakulty sociálních vìd University Karlovy v Praze). Praha: FSV UK, pp. 6086.
- Mlèoch L. (1996): Institucionální ekonomie (uèební text pro studenty vysokých kol). Praha.
- Moný I. (1991): Proè tak snadno. Praha.
- Muller P. (1987): Un métier né de la crise: exploitant rural. Sociologie du travail, (4).
Go to original source...
- North D. (1994): Vývoj ekonomické výkonnosti v èase (pøednáka u pøíleitosti udìlení Nobelovy ceny, 9. prosince 1993). In: Joná J. a kol.: Oslava ekonomie (pøednáky laureátù Nobelovy ceny za ekonomii). Praha, pp. 754765.
- Putnam R. (1993): Making democracy work: civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Go to original source...
- Sucksmith M. (2002): Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: Perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2): 208218.
Go to original source...
- Velký sociologický slovník (1996). Praha.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.