Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2003, 49(6):284-289 | DOI: 10.17221/5388-AGRICECON

The effect of feeding technologies on the economics of fattening pigs

M. ©prysl, R. Stupka
Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic

The aim of the experiment in test station was to evaluate productive performance with respect to feeding-technologies through the test for LWs × (LW×L) genotype in pigs. The productive performance as growth capacity, feeding intake and quantitative traits of slaughter value was examined for 144 hybrid pigs divided in two identical groups, where the 1st group was fed ad-libitum and the 2nd one semi-ad-libitum. On the base of profit formula, the ad-libitum system of feeding in pigs is better in all economic features.

Keywords: pig, feeding, performance, testing, economics, profit formula

Published: June 30, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©prysl M, Stupka R. The effect of feeding technologies on the economics of fattening pigs. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2003;49(6):284-289. doi: 10.17221/5388-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Bampton P.R., Curran M.K., Kempson R.E. (1977): A comparison of “on.farm” and station testing in pigs. Anim. Prod., 25: 83–94. Go to original source...
  2. Bereskin B., Steele N.C., Mitchell A.D. (1990): Selection line x diet interactions for two lines of pigs fed 12 or 24% protein diet. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 944–959. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. De Hear L.C.M. (1990): Sire % protein x testing regime interactions in growing pigs. Anim. Prod., 51: 357–364. Go to original source...
  4. De Hear L.C.M., De Vries A.G. (1993): Effect of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern og group housed growing pigs. Livestock Prod. Sci., 36: 223–232. Go to original source...
  5. De Vriese A.G., Kains E. (1992): A growth model to estimate economic values for food intake capacity in pigs. Anim. Prod., 55: 241–246. Go to original source...
  6. Dempfle L., Merks J.W.M. (1991): Contribution to 42nd EAAP. Berlin, 9–12. VIII. 1991.
  7. Jakubec V. (1990): Uplatnìní biometrické genetiky ve šlechtìní hospodáøských zvíøat. ÈSAZ, Sbor. ÈSAZ, 133.
  8. Krick B.J., Roneker K.R., Boyd R.D., Beermann D.H., David P.J., Meisenger D.J. (1992): Influence of genotype and sex on the response of growing pigs to recombinant porcine somatotropin. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 3024–3034. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Mc Phee C.P., Williams K.C., Daniels L.J. (1991): The effect of selection for rapid lean growth on the dietary lyzine and energy requirements of pigs fed to scale. Livestock Prod. Sci., 27: 185–198. Go to original source...
  10. Merks J.W.M. (1988): Genotype x environmental interactions in pig breeding programmes. IV. Sire x herd interaction in on-farm test results. Livestock Prod. Sci., 20: 325–336. Go to original source...
  11. Merks J.W.M. (1989): Genotype x environmental interactions in pig breeding programmes. IV. Genetic relations between performance in central test, on-farm test and commercial fattening. Livestock Prod. Sci., 22: 325–339. Go to original source...
  12. Nossaman D.A., Schinckel A.P., Miller L.F., Mills S.E. (1991): Interaction of somatotropin and genotype on the requirement for energy in two lines of finishing pigs. J. Nutr., 121: 223. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Podìbradský Z. (1980): Ekonomické aspekty racionálních opatøení v chovu prasat. Stud. Inform. ÚVTIZ, Zem. Ekon.,1.
  14. Pulkrábek J. (2001): Zajištìní objektivního zpenìžování prasat systémem SEUROP – kontrolní mechanismy. Proceedings Aktuální problémy chovu prasat, ÈZU Praha: 14–20. Go to original source...
  15. Rao D.S., McCracken K.J. (1990): Protein requirement of boars of high genetic potential for lean growth Anim. Prod., 51: 179–187. Go to original source...
  16. Rao D.S., McCracken K.J. (1992): Energy x protein interaction in growing boars of high potential for lean growth. 2. Effect of chemical composition of gain and whole-body protein turn-over. Anim. Prod., 53: 83–93. Go to original source...
  17. Standal N. (1977): Correlation between breeding values estimated from station test and on-farm test data. Acta Agric. Scand., 27: 138–144. Go to original source...
  18. Stern S., Rydhamer L., Johansson K., Andersson K. (1990): Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Prod., XV. Edinburgh, UK: 450–453.
  19. Van Diepen T., Kennedy B.W. (1989): Genetic correlations between test station and on-farm performance for growth rate and backfat in pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 67: 1425–1431. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Vrchlabský J., Palásek J. (1992): Objektivizace tøídìní jateèných tìl zvíøat. VÚVL Brno, 22.
  21. Webb A.J., Curran M.K. (1986): Selection regime by production system interaction in pig improvement – a review of possible causes and solution. Livestock Prod. Sci., 14: 41–47. Župka Z. (1992): Zisková funkce. Nauè. slov. zem., ZN Brázda, Praha, 13: 387–388. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.