Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2003, 49(4):166-172 | DOI: 10.17221/5374-AGRICECON

Land policy in France and its consequence for the farmers

J.P. Boinon
Unité Mixte de Recherches INRA-ENESAD, Dijon Cedex, France

This paper is related to the application of the land policies implemented in France in 2nd half of the 20th century, and their consequences on the economy of the agricultural sector and the operation of the farms. Starting from a framework of historical and institutional analysis, the object of this research is to analyse the economic and institutional determinants of these land policies. In France of small landowners, the existence of the right of ownership is considered as an obstacle for a fast evolution of the structures of farms which are sufficient size to implement technological progress allowing the profits of productivity. The aim of the land policy followed in France since the end of the Second World War was to encourage the development of such farms. The main measures were the statute of the tenant farming, the control of the structures and the control of the land market by the SAFER. This policy is implemented at a departmental level by the representatives of the Farmers Unions and generally supports the access to the land for young farmers or the middle-sized farmers.

Keywords: agricultural land policy, France, institutional theory, land property

Published: April 30, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boinon JP. Land policy in France and its consequence for the farmers. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2003;49(4):166-172. doi: 10.17221/5374-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Allaire G., Boyer R. (ed) (1995): La grande transformation de l'agriculture. Paris, INRA, Economica, 444 p.
  2. Barthélemy D., Boinon J.P. (2001): Agricultural land policy, farm operating and farm structures in France. Agricultural Economics (Zemìdìlská ekonomika), 47 (7): 285–289.
  3. Barthélemy D. (1988): La naissance de l'entreprise agricole. Paris, Economica, 185 p.
  4. Barthélemy D., Boinon J.P. (1974): Accroissement de la propriété, paysanne et développement de l'exploitation moyenne. Économie rurale n° 104, novembre-décembre: 35-40. Go to original source...
  5. Berriet-Solliec M., Boinon J.P. (2002): Installation et accès au foncier à travers les projets agricoles départementaux et le fonctionnement de quelques Commissions Départementales d'Orientation de l'A griculture. Actes du colloque l'accès au métier d'agriculteur CNASEA Toulouse, 5 et 6 mars: 67-72.
  6. Boinon J.P. (1995): Rural land market in France: evolutions and trends. In: VÚZE (ed.): Pùda v ekonomikých souvislostech. Praha, pp. 25–35 (Sborník ze semináøe ve Špindlerovì Mlýnì 2.–6. 10.).
  7. Boinon J.P. (1988): La géographie du prix des terres en France (1955-1985): rôle des rapports fonciers et des systèmes de production. In: Économie Rurale, n° 187, septembre-octobre: 2-9. Go to original source...
  8. Boussard J.M. (2000): Faut-il encore des politiques agricoles? Demeter Armand Colin.
  9. De Crisenoy C. (1988): De l'origine et du rôle de la politique foncière agricole. Économie Rurale, 184,185,186, mars-août: 85-91. Go to original source...
  10. Coulomb P. (1990): La cogestion: une nouvelle tentative corporatiste? In: Coulomb P. et al. (ed): Les agriculteurs et la politique. Paris, FNSP, pp. 147-157.
  11. Dutertre C., El Mouhoub M., Moati P., Petit P. (2000): Secteurs et territoires dans les régulations émergentes. La lettre de la régulation, 33, juin: 1-5.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.