Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2002, 48(6):245-250 | DOI: 10.17221/5312-AGRICECON

Could social capital help Czech agriculture?

J. Chloupková, Ch. BJØRNSKOV
The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Unit of Economics, Copenhagen, Denmark **Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics, Aarhus, Denmark

Recent literature and research on social capital has demonstrated the economic importance of social features, such as trust and norms that facilitate cooperation. This article focuses on the role of social capital in the context of the Czech agricultural sector. Obtaining credit, sharing machinery, and proliferating information serves as examples where an awareness and reliance on the social capital of rural communities matter. By forming groups and strengthening existing networks, Czech farmers can improve their productivity, as well as their welfare. The article concludes by warning that the Czech state cannot invest directly in social capital, but should create the necessary legal and economic incentives to encourage the formation of social capital.

Keywords: social capital, cooperation, transition, agriculture

Published: June 30, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chloupková J, BJØRNSKOV C. Could social capital help Czech agriculture? Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2002;48(6):245-250. doi: 10.17221/5312-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson C.L., Locker L., Nugent R. (2000): Microcredit, Social Capital, and Common Pool Resources. Presented at “Constituting the Commons”, the eight conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property; Bloomington, Indiana, USA, May 31–June 4.
  2. Bastelaer van T. (1999): Does Social Capital Facilitate the Poor’s Access to Credit. SCI Working Paper no. 8, The World Bank, Washington DC.
  3. Bazan L., Schmitz H. (1997): Social Capital and Export Growth: An Industrial Community in Southern Brazil. IDS Discussion Paper No. 361; Institute of Development Studies, University of Brighton.
  4. Bebbington A. (1997): Social Capital and Rural Intensification: Local Organizations and Islands of Sustainability in the Rural Andes. The Geographical Journal, 163, (2): 189– 197. Go to original source...
  5. Chloupková J. (2002): Czech agricultural sector: Organisational structure and its transformation. Unit of Economics Working Papers 2002/1; Department of Economics and Natural Resources, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
  6. Chloupková J., Bjørnskov C. (2002): Counting in Social Capital when Easing Agricultural Credit Constraints. Journal of Microfinance, in print.
  7. Doucha T., Divila E. (2001): Farm transformation and restructuring in Czech Agriculture – After ten years. The new structure of the rural economy of post-communist countries; Slavic Research Centre.
  8. Fidler P. (1998): Assessing the performance of Banco Solidario, SA as a provider of Microfinance. Case study in Microfinance; World Bank, Washington DC.
  9. Grootaert C. (1998): Social Capital – The Missing Link? SCI Working paper No. 3.; World Bank, Washington DC.
  10. Grootaert C., Narayan D. (2000): Local Institutions, Poverty and Household Welfare in Bolivia. LLI Working paper No. 9; World Bank, Washington DC. Go to original source...
  11. Grosh B., Somolekae G. (1996): Mighty Oaks from Little Acorns: Can Microenterprise Serve as Seedbed of Industrialisation? World Development; 24, (1): 1 879–1 890. Go to original source...
  12. Isham J. (2000): The effect of social capital on technology adoption: evidence from rural Tanzania. IRIS Working Paper no. 235, University of Maryland. Go to original source...
  13. Knack S., Keefer P. (1997): Does Social Capital Have an Economic Pay-off? A Cross-Country Investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, pp. 1 251–1 288. Go to original source...
  14. Kubaèák A. (1992): Dìjiny zemìdìlství v Èeských zemích (History of agriculture in the Czech lands). Credit Praha.
  15. Paldam M., Svendsen G.T. (2001): Missing social capital and the transition in Eastern Europe. Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition; forthcoming.
  16. Parish N. (2000): Report on the situation and perspectives of young farmers in the European Union (2000/2011(INI)). Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development; European Parliament; Brussels; November.
  17. Paxton J. (1999): Colombia – Banco Caja Social. Case studies in Microfinance; World Bank, Washington DC.
  18. Pithart P. (2000): Banky do záchranných èlunù, kampelièky do moøe (Banks into rescue boats, kampelitchkas into the sea). ZN Noviny, 15 April.
  19. Putnam R.D. (1993): Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  20. Putnam R.D. (1995): Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, (1). Go to original source...
  21. Rodrik D. (1998): Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflicts, and Growth Collapses. NBER Working Paper no. 6350, NBER, Cambridge, Mass., USA. Go to original source...
  22. Schmitz H. (1999): From Ascribed to Earned Trust in Exporting Clusters. Journal of International Economics, 48, pp. 139–150. Go to original source...
  23. Stolle, D., Rochon T. (1998): Are All Associations Alike? Member Diversity, Associational Type and the Creation of Social Capital. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, (1): 47– 65. Go to original source...
  24. Sudarsky J. (1999): Columbia’s Social Capital. The National Measurement with the Barcas. Work in progress; World Bank.
  25. Temple J. (1998): Initial conditions, social capital, and growth in Africa. Journal of African Economies, 7, (3): 309–347); October. Go to original source...
  26. Weijland H. (1999): Microenterprise Clusters in Rural Indonesia: Industrial Seedbed and Policy Target. World Development, 27, (9): 1515–1 530. Go to original source...
  27. Woolcock M. (1999): Managing risk, shocks, and opportunity in developing economies: the role of social capital. Work in progress; World Bank.
  28. Zak P., Knack S. (2001): Trust and Growth. The Economic Journal, 111, pp. 295–321. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.