Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2002, 48(4):155-160 | DOI: 10.17221/5296-AGRICECON

Non-standard activities on farms in the Province of Zeeland in the Netherlands: an export base approach

W.J.M. Heijman, M.H. Hubregtse, J.A.C. Van Ophem
Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, The Netherlands

In this paper, the economic impact of non-standard activities on farms (NSAF) is analysed. After a discussion of NSAF, the export base theory is introduced as the analytical tool to assess its regional economic impact. The theory is applied to the Province of Zeeland in the Netherlands for the period 1998-2008. The first conclusion is that employment will increase by an estimated 193 full-time equivalents per year in this decade. This growth is mainly attributed to an expected rise in agri-tourism. The second overall conclusion is that the export base theory is a fruitful method to assess the regional economic effects of NSAF. The method may be applied to other regions as well.

Keywords: rural development, non-standard activities on farms, export base theory, regional employment

Published: April 30, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Heijman WJM, Hubregtse MH, Van Ophem JAC. Non-standard activities on farms in the Province of Zeeland in the Netherlands: an export base approach. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2002;48(4):155-160. doi: 10.17221/5296-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. CBS (Statistics Netherlands, 2001). www.cbs.statline.nl.
  2. FAIR (2000): Ongoing European Research project with the target to identify the consequences of all changes and innovations in the rural areas. Unpublished manuscripts.
  3. Ham A. van der, Schans J.W. van der (1999): Verbreding, wat vinden boeren ervan? [Opinion of farmers on broadening of their activities]. Rapport Landbouw-Economisch Instituut (LEI), Den Haag.
  4. Hermans C.M.L., Vereijken P.H. (1998): Multifunctionele landbouw, Ruimtelijke verkenning van de landelijke behoefte op gemeenteniveau [Multifunctional agriculture, spatial explorations at the municipal level]. Rapport DLO-Staring Centrum, Wageningen.
  5. Hillebrand J.H.A., Koole B. (1999): Atlas ontwikkeling landbouw [Map of developments in agriculture]. Rapport Landbouw-Economisch Instituut (LEI), Den Haag.
  6. Lambooy J.G. (1980): Economie en ruimte, inleiding in de economische geografie en de regionale economie, deel 1 Locatietheorie en regionale vraagstukken [Economy and space, introduction into the economic geography and regional economics, part 1 Location theory and regional issues]. Assen, van Gorcum.
  7. LNV (1997): Verkenning Agrotoerisme, Agrotoerisme, een boeiend perspectief voor wie het past; Advies aan de directeuren Landbouw en Groene Ruimte en Recreatie [Report of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Conservation and Fisheries of the Netherlands on agrotourism]. Ministerie van LNV, Projectgroep Verkenning Agrotourisme, Den Haag.
  8. Vries W.M. de (1992): Pluri-activiteit in de Nederlandse Landbouw [Multiple activities in the countryside of the Netherlands]. Studies van landbouw en platteland nr. 17, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, Wageningen.
  9. RUG/CBS (1999): Regionale samenhangen in Nederland [Regional relationships in the Netherlands]. Stichting Ruimtelijke Economie, Groningen, Regionale publicaties nr. 20.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.