Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(12):527-535 | DOI: 10.17221/310/2017-AGRICECON

Sustainable economic development assessment model for family farmsOriginal Paper

Juraté SAVICKIENÉ*, Astrida MICEIKIENÉ
Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Kaunas, Lithuania

This article is aimed to address the issue of sustainable economic development assessment in family farms. A complex methodology of family farm sustainable economic development assessment based on the family farm sustainable economic development index has been created following analysis of family farm sustainable economic development assessment methodologies, which are proposed by scientists and used in practice. The Kruskal-Wallis test and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to check the relevance of the index in family farm sustainable economic development assessment. The index value range was calculated using descriptive statistics. The characteristics of the index allow creating models for family farm sustainable economic development classification types based on k-means clustering. The family farms were classified into nine types. Examples of Lithuanian family farms were provided to demonstrate practical applications of the index. Furthermore, analysis of Lithuanian family farm sustainable economic development types by specialisation enabled to identify the main reasons for the existing situation in the farms.

Keywords: family farms, family farm sustainable economic development index, sustainable economic development

Published: December 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SAVICKIENÉ J, MICEIKIENÉ A. Sustainable economic development assessment model for family farms. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(12):527-535. doi: 10.17221/310/2017-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. American Society of Agronomy (ASA) (1989): Decision reached on sustainable agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy News, Jan 15, 1989.
  2. Argiles J.M. (2001): Accounting information and prediction of farm non-viability. European Accounting Review, 10: 73-105. Go to original source...
  3. Bossel H. (2001): Assessing viability and sustainability: a systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicator sets. Conservation Ecology, 5: 1-12. Go to original source...
  4. Francis C., Lieblein G., Gliessman S., Breland T.A., Creamer N., Harwood R., Salomonsson L., Helenius J., Rickerl D., Salvador R., Wiedenhoeft M., Simmons S., Allen P., Altieri M., Flora C., Poincelot R. (2003): Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. Journal of sustainable agriculture, 22: 99-118. Go to original source...
  5. Gafsi M., Legagneux B., Nguyen G., Robina P. (2006): Towards sustainable farming systems: Effectiveness and deficiency of the French procedure of sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 90: 226-242. Go to original source...
  6. Gliessman S.R. (2007): Agroecology: the Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. CRC Press, London, New York. Go to original source...
  7. Gomiero T., Pimentel D., Paoletti M.G. (2011): Is there a need for a more sustainable agriculture? Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30: 6-23. Go to original source...
  8. Koleda N., Lace N. (2009): Analysis of financial viability in the context of company's sustainability. Scientific Journal of RTU, 19: 53-62.
  9. Koleda N., Lace N. (2010): Dynamic factor analysis of financial viability of Latvian service sector companies. Economics and Management 2010, 15: 620-626.
  10. Long N.T. (2012): Sustainability Assessment of Vegetable Cultivation Systems in the Red River Delta Vietnam. [doctoral dissertation]. Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
  11. Malhotra N.K. (2007): Marketing Research: an Applied Orientation. Prentice-Hall International, London.
  12. Morehart M. (2000): A Fair income for farmers? Agricultural Outlook (AGO-271), May 22-26, 2000.
  13. Pimentel D., Hepperly P., Hanson J., Douds D., Seidel R. (2005): Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience, 55: 573-582. Go to original source...
  14. Pretty J. (2008): Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363: 447-465. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Scott J. (2001): The Nova Scotia Genuine Progress Index Soils and Agriculture Accounts. Part 1: Farm Viability and Economic Capacity in Nova Scotia. NS: GPI Atlantic, 71.
  16. Scotti E., Bergmann H., Henke R., Hovorka G. (2011): Evaluation of Income Effects of Direct Support. [final report]. EEIG AGROSYNERGIE, 261.
  17. Scott J., Colman R. (2008): The GPI soils and agriculture accounts: economic viability of farms and farm communities in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island - an update. NS: GPI Atlantic, 87.
  18. Singh M., Bhillar A.S., Joshi A.S. (2009): Factors influencing economic viability of marginal and small farmers in Punjab. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22: 269-279.
  19. Tisdell C. (1996): Economic indicators to assess the sustainability of conservation farming projects: An evaluation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 57: 117-131. Go to original source...
  20. UNEP (2010): Sustainable agriculture and the sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity: concepts, trends and challenges. In: Convention on Biological Diversion. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice - Fourteenth Meeting Nairobi, May 10-21, 2010.
  21. USDA (1990): Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. Public Law 101-624, Title XVI, Subtitle A, Section 1603. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
  22. Van der Meulen H.A.B., Dolman M.A., Jager J.H., Venema G.S. (2014): The impact of farm size on sustainability of Dutch dairy farms. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 3: 119-123.
  23. Vitunskienė V., Vinciūnienė V. (2014): Viešosios paramos reikšmė siekiantaplinkos darnumo Lietuvos žemės ūkyje. In: Darnus Vystymasis: Teorija ir Praktika: Kolektyvinė Monografija. VU, 252-281.
  24. Wu J., Wu T. (2012): Sustainability indicators and indices. In: Madu Ch.N., Kuei C. (eds): Handbook of Sustainable Management. Imperial College Press, London. Go to original source...
  25. Zimdahl R. (2012). Agriculture's Ethical Horizon. 2 nd Ed. Elsevier Science Limited.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.